Posts: 8797
posted on 29/10/2020 12:20Have you read the actual report? - Gramsci.
I haven't. But I just came off the 'phone (about another matter) with an ex-MEP who has.
He just told me that the EHRC's reference to interference from the LOTO's Office was specifically when cases were in the public domain, against a background of media attention and accusations of the Party dragging its heels.. And that the interference was the LOTO's Office asking for a speeding up of the process of deaing with them and it asking what additional admin help was required by McNicol's people responsible for processing cases.
Is the ex-MEP right? Is that the interference of which the report/you speak?
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
He just told me that the EHRC's reference to interference from the LOTO's Office was specifically when cases were in the public domain, against a background of media attention and accusations of the Party dragging its heels.. And that the interference was the LOTO's Office asking for a speeding up of the process of deaing with them and it asking what additional admin help was required by McNicol's people responsible for processing cases.
Is the ex-MEP right? Is that the interference of which the report/you speak?
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- Spare a thought. - Nicolae 29/10 10:23 (read 18468 times, 17 posts in thread)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.