Posts: 8797
posted on 29/10/2020 12:20Have you read the actual report? - Gramsci.
I haven't. But I just came off the 'phone (about another matter) with an ex-MEP who has.
He just told me that the EHRC's reference to interference from the LOTO's Office was specifically when cases were in the public domain, against a background of media attention and accusations of the Party dragging its heels.. And that the interference was the LOTO's Office asking for a speeding up of the process of deaing with them and it asking what additional admin help was required by McNicol's people responsible for processing cases.
Is the ex-MEP right? Is that the interference of which the report/you speak?
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
He just told me that the EHRC's reference to interference from the LOTO's Office was specifically when cases were in the public domain, against a background of media attention and accusations of the Party dragging its heels.. And that the interference was the LOTO's Office asking for a speeding up of the process of deaing with them and it asking what additional admin help was required by McNicol's people responsible for processing cases.
Is the ex-MEP right? Is that the interference of which the report/you speak?
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- Spare a thought. - Nicolae 29/10 10:23 (read 18464 times, 17 posts in thread)