Posts: 6602
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 18375 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 18838 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 18740 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 19217 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 18884 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 19375 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 19349 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 19470 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 19130 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 19373 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 19063 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 19618 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 19330 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 19291 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 19330 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 18756 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 17982 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 19618 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 19063 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 19373 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 19130 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 19470 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 19349 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 19375 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 18884 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 19217 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 18740 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 18838 times)
