Posts: 6581
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 17305 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 17759 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 17645 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 18157 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 17814 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 18255 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 18265 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 18356 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 18017 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 18245 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 17965 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 18510 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 18223 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 18202 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 18223 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 17696 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 16935 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 18510 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 17965 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 18245 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 18017 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 18356 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 18265 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 18255 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 17814 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 18157 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 17645 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 17759 times)
