Posts: 6539
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 16296 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 16679 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 16586 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 17057 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 16715 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 17141 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 17180 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 17261 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 16947 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 17127 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 16886 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 17385 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 17126 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 17108 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 17126 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 16646 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 15887 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 17385 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 16886 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 17127 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 16947 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 17261 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 17180 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 17141 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 16715 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 17057 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 16586 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 16679 times)
