Posts: 6434
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 13771 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 14018 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 13993 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 14380 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 14133 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 14483 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 14439 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 14568 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 14320 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 14465 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 14270 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 14429 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 14403 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 14080 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 14403 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 13930 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 13279 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 14429 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 14270 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 14465 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 14320 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 14568 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 14439 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 14483 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 14133 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 14380 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 13993 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 14018 times)