Posts: 6475
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 15206 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 15511 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 15459 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 15898 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 15587 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 15961 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 16023 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 16061 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 15812 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 15952 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 15747 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 16058 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 15909 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 15773 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 15909 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 15482 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 14702 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 16058 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 15747 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 15952 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 15812 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 16061 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 16023 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 15961 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 15587 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 15898 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 15459 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 15511 times)
