Posts: 6545
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 16468 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 16849 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 16760 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 17235 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 16901 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 17325 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 17365 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 17445 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 17124 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 17317 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 17060 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 17582 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 17310 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 17292 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 17310 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 16822 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 16054 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 17582 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 17060 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 17317 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 17124 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 17445 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 17365 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 17325 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 16901 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 17235 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 16760 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 16849 times)
