2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21706 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17537 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18306 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18616 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19111 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19336 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19217 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19422 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19537 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19580 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19951 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19939 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20217 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20014 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20127 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20261 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20160 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20151 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19936 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19942 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20004 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19787 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19409 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18630 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18348 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17652 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse