posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24971 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20043 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20843 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21173 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20843 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21668 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21769 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22341 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22052 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22168 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22907 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22476 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23134 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22565 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23099 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22829 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23085 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22722 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22501 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22918 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22572 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22722 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23085 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22829 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23099 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22565 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23134 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22476 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22907 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22168 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22052 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22341 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22756 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21969 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20898 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20515 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20898 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21969 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21769 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20043 times)

