posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- https://boris-johnson-lies.com/ -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- https://boris-johnson-lies.com/ -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 613 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 567 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 599 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 616 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 599 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 661 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 644 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 662 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 612 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 618 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 629 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 664 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 692 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 690 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 698 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 697 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 721 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 741 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 785 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 776 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 703 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 691 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 785 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 741 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 721 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 697 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 698 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 690 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 692 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 664 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 629 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 618 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 612 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 713 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 675 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 649 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 625 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 570 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 625 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 649 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 675 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 662 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 567 times)