posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21602 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17365 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18239 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18544 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18239 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19064 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19276 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19141 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19341 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19455 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19497 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19873 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19848 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19902 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20028 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20170 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20064 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20065 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19862 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19759 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19919 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20065 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20064 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20170 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20028 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19902 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20112 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19848 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19873 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19497 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19455 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19341 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19712 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19247 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18545 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18280 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17580 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18280 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18545 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19247 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19141 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17365 times)