2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- https://boris-johnson-lies.com/ -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 611 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 566 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 599 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 615 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 660 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 644 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 662 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 611 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 617 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 628 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 664 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 692 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 689 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 697 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 696 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 721 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 741 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 784 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 775 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 703 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 690 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 712 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 675 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 649 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 625 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 570 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse