2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25610 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20396 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21232 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21560 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22062 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22269 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22156 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22733 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22424 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22581 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23312 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22872 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23531 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22957 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23486 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23228 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23475 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23116 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22932 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23302 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22952 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23170 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22368 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21970 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21290 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20917 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse