2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24609 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19789 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20602 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20923 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21440 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21652 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21523 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22040 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21815 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21921 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22620 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22244 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22851 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22311 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22816 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22573 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22790 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22474 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22233 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22615 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22321 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22454 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21725 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21257 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20657 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20242 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse