posted on 19/11/2020 11:33I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae
live from his home office presumably, avec the Palestinian flag draped on his wall behind him. Presumably exercising his rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25749 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20527 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21365 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21689 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21365 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22185 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22289 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22862 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22553 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22715 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23450 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22995 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23663 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23076 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23616 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23351 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23611 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23242 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23059 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23425 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23073 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23242 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23611 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23351 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23616 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23076 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23663 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22995 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23450 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22715 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22553 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22862 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23297 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22490 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22095 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21420 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21053 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21420 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22095 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22490 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22289 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20527 times)


