posted on 19/11/2020 11:33I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae
live from his home office presumably, avec the Palestinian flag draped on his wall behind him. Presumably exercising his rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26346 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22225 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22784 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23013 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23443 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23257 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23520 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24191 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23630 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24140 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23769 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23632 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23944 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23581 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23769 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24140 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23630 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24191 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23520 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23257 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23443 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23875 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23031 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22633 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21612 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22633 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23031 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)


