posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25164 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20165 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20975 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21306 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20975 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21806 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22030 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21897 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22463 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22186 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22313 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23037 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22600 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23262 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22683 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23221 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22956 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23212 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22853 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22654 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23043 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22704 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22853 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23212 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22956 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23221 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22683 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23262 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22600 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23037 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22313 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22186 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22463 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22882 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22107 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21680 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21028 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20648 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21028 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21680 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22107 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21897 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20165 times)

