Posts: 8347
posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- https://boris-johnson-lies.com/ -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- https://boris-johnson-lies.com/ -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 734 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 687 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 725 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 753 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 725 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 797 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 794 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 804 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 736 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 757 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 789 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 824 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 863 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 856 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 867 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 863 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 881 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 911 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 959 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 939 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 863 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 861 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 959 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 911 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 881 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 863 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 867 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 856 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 863 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 824 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 789 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 757 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 736 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 879 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 836 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 798 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 749 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 683 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 749 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 798 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 836 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 804 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 687 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.