2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23218 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18661 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19477 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19788 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20336 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20543 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20423 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20814 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20765 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20846 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21383 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21172 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21627 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21263 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21583 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21529 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21577 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21410 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21135 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21342 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21216 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21196 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20608 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19996 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19523 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18993 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse