posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12497 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11021 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11411 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11021 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11707 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11912 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12027 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12012 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12213 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12260 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12533 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12604 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12667 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12693 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12582 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12718 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12516 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12453 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12404 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12718 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12582 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12693 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12667 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12604 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12533 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12260 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12213 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12012 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12287 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12063 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11367 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10831 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11367 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12063 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12027 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)