posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12801 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10866 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11234 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11634 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11234 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11917 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12140 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12259 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12244 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12442 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12484 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12644 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12777 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12869 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12911 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12915 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12953 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12825 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12961 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12762 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12693 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12630 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12961 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12825 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12953 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12915 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12911 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12869 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12777 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12644 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12484 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12244 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12532 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12279 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11816 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11569 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11023 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11569 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11816 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12279 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12259 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10866 times)