2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26461 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21160 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22021 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22361 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22933 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23154 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22965 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23588 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23228 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23400 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24151 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23681 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24356 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23778 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24318 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24058 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24316 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23904 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23791 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24106 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23728 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24024 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23173 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22784 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22121 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21739 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse