2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28898 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22996 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23899 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24272 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24854 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25046 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24904 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25502 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25162 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25367 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26149 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25601 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26312 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25751 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26255 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26083 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26236 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25836 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25832 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26005 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25566 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25932 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25048 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24642 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23998 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23580 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse