2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21702 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17534 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18304 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18614 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19110 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19334 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19215 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19419 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19536 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19577 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19946 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19936 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20213 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20010 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20122 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20257 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20153 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20144 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19935 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19937 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19999 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19787 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19407 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18628 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18345 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17648 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse