2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23813 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19235 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20050 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20351 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20868 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21083 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20976 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21355 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21279 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21367 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21927 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21689 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22169 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21780 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22130 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22041 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22104 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21934 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21669 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21901 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21740 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21738 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21150 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20570 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20069 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19512 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse