2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24991 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20058 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20867 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21201 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21694 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21920 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21798 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22367 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22077 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22191 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22927 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22498 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23162 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22581 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23112 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22847 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23101 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22741 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22524 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22938 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22585 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22774 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21983 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21571 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20915 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20531 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse