2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....

... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21643 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17493 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18269 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18583 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19084 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19311 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19178 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19380 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19497 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19536 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19904 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19888 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20159 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19954 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20076 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20219 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20106 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20105 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19898 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19897 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19965 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19747 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19371 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18591 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18312 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17613 times)

posted on 18/11/2020 19:36Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse