posted on 19/11/2020 11:33I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae
live from his home office presumably, avec the Palestinian flag draped on his wall behind him. Presumably exercising his rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26034 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20723 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21573 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21882 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21573 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22440 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22671 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22506 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23067 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22757 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22913 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23629 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23178 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23832 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23278 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23810 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23553 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23779 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23419 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23250 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23577 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23227 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23419 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23779 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23553 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23810 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23278 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23832 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23178 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23629 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22913 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22757 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23067 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23511 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22687 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22276 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21624 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21244 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21624 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22276 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22687 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22506 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20723 times)


