posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13153 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11162 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11525 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11938 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11525 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12225 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12583 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12577 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12770 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12823 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12987 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13207 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13247 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13265 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13307 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13168 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13308 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13116 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13056 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12980 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13308 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13168 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13307 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13265 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13247 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13207 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13127 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12987 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12823 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12770 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12577 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12882 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12616 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12147 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11886 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11346 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11886 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12147 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12616 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12583 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11162 times)