posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13059 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11102 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11468 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11882 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11468 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12154 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12381 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12522 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12501 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12696 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12746 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12906 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13049 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13140 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13181 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13194 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13234 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13095 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13226 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13037 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12981 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12896 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13226 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13095 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13234 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13194 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13181 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13140 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13049 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12906 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12746 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12696 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12501 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12802 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12546 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12074 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11815 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11268 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11815 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12074 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12546 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12522 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11102 times)