2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26034 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20733 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21583 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21890 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22447 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22678 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22512 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23075 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22770 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22920 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23636 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23184 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23839 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23286 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23817 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23558 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23784 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23424 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23257 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23583 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23233 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23514 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22689 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22278 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21629 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21249 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse