2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24981 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20049 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20854 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21180 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21677 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21905 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21778 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22352 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22064 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22178 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22918 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22491 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23152 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22578 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23109 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22843 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23096 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22730 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22515 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22930 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22578 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22766 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21977 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21562 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20904 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20524 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse