posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12494 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11020 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11410 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11020 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11705 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11910 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12026 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12008 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12212 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12258 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12532 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12599 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12691 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12580 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12716 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12514 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12452 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12399 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12716 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12580 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12691 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12599 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12532 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12258 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12212 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12008 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12285 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12060 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11363 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10828 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11363 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11589 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12060 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12026 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)