posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23914 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19276 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20106 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20400 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20106 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20935 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21024 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21425 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21328 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21423 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22005 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21749 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22250 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21823 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22208 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22091 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22192 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21987 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21730 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21997 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21822 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21987 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22192 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22091 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22208 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21823 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22250 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21749 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22005 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21423 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21425 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21823 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21232 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20657 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20152 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19609 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20152 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20657 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21232 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21024 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19276 times)

