posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31743 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25510 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26417 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26847 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26417 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27401 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27639 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28252 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27901 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 28095 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28948 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28246 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28429 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28920 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28830 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28936 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28529 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28661 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28675 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 28126 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28529 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28936 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28830 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28920 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28429 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28973 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28246 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28948 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 28095 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27901 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28252 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28618 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27708 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27244 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26531 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 26152 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26531 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27244 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27708 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27597 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25510 times)

