posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21636 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17482 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18260 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18573 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18260 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19083 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19300 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19164 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19489 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19525 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19894 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19875 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20144 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19937 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20059 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20200 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20089 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20086 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19886 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19882 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19950 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20086 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20089 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20200 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20059 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19937 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20144 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19875 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19894 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19525 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19489 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19369 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19737 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19362 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18575 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18304 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17604 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18304 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18575 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19164 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17482 times)