posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21669 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17514 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18287 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18605 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18287 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19101 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19324 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19195 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19398 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19515 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19556 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19920 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19909 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20184 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19986 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20102 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20239 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20129 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20128 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19923 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19916 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19985 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20128 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20129 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20239 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20102 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19986 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20184 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19909 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19556 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19515 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19398 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19768 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19392 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18615 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18329 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17630 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18329 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18615 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19195 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17514 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.