posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24974 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20045 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20846 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21174 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20846 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21671 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21772 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22344 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22055 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22172 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22914 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22479 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23138 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22570 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23101 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22833 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23091 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22726 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22505 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22922 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22574 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22726 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23091 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22833 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23101 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22570 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23138 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22479 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22914 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22172 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22055 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22344 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22757 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21971 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20519 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20899 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21554 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21971 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21772 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20045 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

