posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24059 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19399 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20217 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20534 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20217 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21052 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21279 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21142 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21552 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21449 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21544 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22142 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21871 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22374 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21945 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22343 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22213 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22318 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22100 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21848 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22123 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21944 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22100 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22318 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22213 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22343 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21945 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22374 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21871 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22142 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21544 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21449 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21552 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21954 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20774 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20264 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19736 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20264 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20774 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21351 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21142 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19399 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

