2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.

Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.

I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23903 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19274 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20101 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20393 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20925 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21153 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21017 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21415 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21319 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21414 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21998 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21737 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22241 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21818 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22195 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22088 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22177 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21979 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21719 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21977 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21811 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21811 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21228 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20645 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20145 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19598 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.

Report Abuse