posted on 19/11/2020 11:33I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae
live from his home office presumably, avec the Palestinian flag draped on his wall behind him. Presumably exercising his rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26034 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20730 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21579 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21886 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21579 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22444 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22676 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22511 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23074 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22766 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22917 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23632 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23181 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23836 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23282 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23814 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23556 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23782 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23423 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23253 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23579 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23227 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23423 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23782 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23556 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23814 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23282 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23836 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23181 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23632 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22917 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22766 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23074 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23512 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22688 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22276 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21628 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21247 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21628 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22276 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22688 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22511 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20730 times)


