posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23864 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19256 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20074 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20370 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20074 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20891 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21122 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20999 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21384 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21300 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21389 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21955 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21711 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22205 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21798 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22160 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22060 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22135 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21958 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21689 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21933 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21778 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21958 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22135 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22060 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22160 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21798 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22205 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21711 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21955 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21389 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21300 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21384 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21777 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21190 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20600 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20095 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19552 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20095 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20600 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21190 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20999 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19256 times)

