2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

It does seems strange (to an outsider) that, as their power is slipping away, the hard left are now calling for party unity, but didn't seem so keen on it when they were in control.

Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech doesn't smack much of unity either. Nor do comments like it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" or "You and I know full well it was ******", that appear to be completely dismissing the report's findings.

It does look (again to an outsider) that there is a (large?) section of Corbynistas that think there was, and is, no problems to address.

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21642 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17489 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18269 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18582 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19084 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19310 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19175 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19377 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19494 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19535 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19902 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19887 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20155 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19952 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20075 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20217 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20105 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20104 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19895 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19895 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19961 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19745 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19370 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18589 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18312 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17613 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

Report Abuse