posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13038 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11086 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11451 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11869 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11451 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12150 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12373 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12509 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12485 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12686 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12731 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12895 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13038 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13125 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13166 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13170 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13223 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13078 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13217 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13024 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12961 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12892 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13217 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13078 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13223 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13170 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13166 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13125 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13038 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12895 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12731 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12686 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12485 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12787 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12541 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12056 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11808 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11255 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11808 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12056 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12541 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12509 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11086 times)