posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13174 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11175 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11532 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11946 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11532 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12238 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12468 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12599 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12788 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12835 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13004 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13139 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13225 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13270 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13284 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13331 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13182 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13329 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13136 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13070 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12998 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13329 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13182 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13331 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13284 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13270 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13225 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13139 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13004 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12835 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12788 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12591 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12894 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12630 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12159 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11900 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11363 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11900 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12159 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12630 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12599 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11175 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.