posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12932 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10963 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11333 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11734 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11333 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12039 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12265 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12370 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12358 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12554 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12605 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12751 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12888 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12970 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13026 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13032 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13070 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12941 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13075 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12878 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12806 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12761 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13075 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12941 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13070 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13032 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13026 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12970 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12888 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12751 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12605 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12554 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12358 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12642 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12415 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11924 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11699 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11145 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11699 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11924 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12415 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12370 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10963 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.