posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12492 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11020 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11410 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11020 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11704 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11909 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12212 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12258 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12532 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12598 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12690 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12579 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12716 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12513 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12452 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12399 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12716 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12579 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12690 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12666 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12662 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12598 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12532 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12258 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12212 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12007 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12284 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12060 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11586 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11361 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10826 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11361 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11586 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12060 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12025 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10653 times)