posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25794 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20573 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21401 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21730 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21401 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22221 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22617 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22774 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23502 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23020 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23685 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23111 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23648 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23397 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23651 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23281 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23109 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23455 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23101 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23281 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23651 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23397 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23648 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23111 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23685 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23020 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23502 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22774 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22617 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22916 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23321 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22519 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22123 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21440 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21087 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21440 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22123 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22519 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22328 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20573 times)


