posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26064 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20783 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21634 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21939 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21634 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22491 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22711 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22559 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23129 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22817 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22968 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23693 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23226 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23891 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23332 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23869 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23610 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23844 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23471 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23311 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23638 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23271 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23471 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23844 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23610 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23869 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23332 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23891 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23226 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23693 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22968 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22817 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23129 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23570 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22734 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22332 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21680 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21310 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21680 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22332 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22734 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22559 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20783 times)


