posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12988 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11032 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11401 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11821 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11401 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12118 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12342 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12456 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12426 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12627 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12681 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12828 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12987 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13060 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13113 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13106 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13163 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13018 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13172 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12969 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12897 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12849 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13172 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13018 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13163 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13106 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13113 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13060 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12987 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12828 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12681 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12627 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12426 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12729 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12494 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12002 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11773 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11205 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11773 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12002 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12494 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12456 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11032 times)