posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26374 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21069 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21934 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22257 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21934 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22834 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23054 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22865 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23481 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23126 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23291 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24045 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23554 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24229 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23658 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24207 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23950 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24182 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23798 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23661 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23982 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23614 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23798 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24182 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23950 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24207 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23658 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24229 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23554 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24045 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23291 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23126 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23481 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23910 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23065 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22672 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22017 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21645 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22017 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22672 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23065 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22865 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21069 times)


