posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25018 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20098 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20907 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21231 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20907 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21719 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21940 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21831 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22389 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22114 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22229 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22956 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22526 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23187 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22609 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23138 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22886 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23135 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22789 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22570 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22966 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22614 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22789 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23135 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22886 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23138 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22609 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23187 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22526 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22956 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22229 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22114 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22389 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22800 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22013 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21596 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20943 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20561 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20943 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21596 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22013 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21831 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20098 times)


