posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25057 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20120 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20927 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21242 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20927 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21741 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21956 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21849 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22404 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22133 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22251 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22983 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22541 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23208 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22628 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23171 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22903 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23160 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22809 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22585 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22987 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22624 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22809 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23160 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22903 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23171 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22628 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23208 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22541 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22983 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22251 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22133 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22404 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22820 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22034 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21617 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20958 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20586 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20958 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21617 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22034 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21849 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20120 times)


