posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26407 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21103 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21966 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22297 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21966 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22877 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23100 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22906 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23523 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23169 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23330 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24097 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23602 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24272 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23697 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24251 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23993 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24228 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23833 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23703 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24029 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23659 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23833 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24228 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23993 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24251 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23697 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24272 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23602 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24097 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23330 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23169 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23523 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23955 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22719 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22062 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21680 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22062 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22719 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22906 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21103 times)


