posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26391 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21086 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21952 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22272 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21952 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22853 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23077 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22882 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23502 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23144 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23306 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24070 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23572 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24245 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23674 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24225 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23968 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24204 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23812 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23680 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24008 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23635 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23812 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24204 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23968 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24225 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23674 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24245 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23572 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24070 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23306 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23144 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23502 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23931 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23087 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22698 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22038 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21667 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22038 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22698 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23087 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22882 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21086 times)


