posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25005 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20089 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20904 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21225 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20904 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21714 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21939 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21824 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22105 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22221 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22948 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22517 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23184 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22601 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23133 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22876 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23126 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22778 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22565 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22958 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22611 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22778 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23126 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22876 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23133 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22601 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23184 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22517 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22948 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22221 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22105 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22386 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22794 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22003 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21587 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20936 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20555 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20936 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21587 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22003 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21824 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20089 times)


