posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13027 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11080 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11444 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11864 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11444 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12147 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12371 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12506 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12480 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12683 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12727 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12888 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13034 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13119 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13157 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13163 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13218 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13073 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13215 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13018 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12955 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12891 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13215 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13073 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13218 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13163 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13157 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13119 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13034 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12888 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12727 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12683 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12480 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12778 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12540 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12050 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11806 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11248 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11806 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12050 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12506 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11080 times)