Posts: 76288
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21633 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17479 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18254 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18571 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18254 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19083 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19298 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19163 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19367 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19488 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19522 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19893 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19874 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20141 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19934 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20057 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20193 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20087 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20085 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19884 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19878 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19950 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20085 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20087 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20193 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20057 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19934 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20141 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19874 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19893 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19522 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19488 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19367 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19735 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19361 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18571 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18302 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17601 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18302 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18571 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19163 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17479 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.