Posts: 174412
posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23700 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19114 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19937 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20241 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19937 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20781 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20998 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20869 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21264 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21188 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21274 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21817 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21602 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22071 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21686 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22026 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21944 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22009 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21826 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21572 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21817 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21653 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21826 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22009 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21944 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22026 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21686 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22071 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21602 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21817 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21274 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21264 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21647 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21061 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20470 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19987 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19420 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19987 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20470 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21061 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20869 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19114 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.