posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13142 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11143 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11507 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11507 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12204 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12432 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12748 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12795 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12970 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13094 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13184 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13222 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13242 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13278 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13141 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13282 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13088 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13028 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12952 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13282 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13141 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13278 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13242 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13222 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13184 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13094 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12970 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12748 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12562 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12861 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12599 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12125 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11865 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11313 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11865 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12125 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12599 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12562 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11143 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.