posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23206 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18650 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19461 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19775 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19461 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20322 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20529 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20410 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20798 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20747 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20827 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21358 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21149 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21609 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21247 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21566 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21509 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21555 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21391 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21118 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21324 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21200 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21391 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21555 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21509 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21566 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21247 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21609 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21149 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21358 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20827 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20747 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20798 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21181 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20594 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19984 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19508 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18978 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19508 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19984 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20594 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20410 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18650 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.